Switzerland Urges Immediate Search For New WIPO Director General

By William New
Switzerland, in its role as host country of the World Intellectual Property Organization, this week issued a call for an immediate search for a new leader of the organisation in order to address concerns of mismanagement and lack of credibility.

In an unusually blunt press statement, the Swiss government expressed dissatisfaction with the failure of the organisation to agree on a budget for the next biennium at its annual General Assembly which concluded Wednesday (IPW, WIPO, 4 October 2007).

Of concern is that Geneva-based WIPO, an important agency of the United Nations, is facing a “serious credibility” issue, and has been criticised for many years due to its management, according to an unofficial translation of the Swiss statement. It cited problems that have been reported to member states and documented through internal and external audits.

In this context, “Switzerland believes that the process of renewing WIPO management (director) should be begun without delay,” it said.

One concern is that the director general, Kamil Idris, has not deemed it necessary to personally answer questions that have been put to him, the government said. These have included questions about his change of birth date in the organisation records after more than two decades.

As host to many international organisations, Switzerland in its governance follows principles of transparency, integrity and reliability at organisations, it said.

Therefore, Switzerland said all appropriate measures should be taken to restore the organisation’s credibility, and it should be a priority to immediately begin the process of selecting a person able to bring about the restoration to be nominated for director general.

William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

Catherine Saez contributed to this report.

French-language statement here:

CommuniquÃĐ de presse
Berne, le 4 octobre 2007
La Suisse n’est pas satisfaite au terme de
l’AssemblÃĐe gÃĐnÃĐrale de l’OMPI

Les travaux de l’AssemblÃĐe gÃĐnÃĐrale de l’Organisation mondiale de la propriÃĐtÃĐ
intellectuelle (OMPI), qui s’est tenue à GenÃĻve du 24 septembre au 3 octobre
2007, n’ont pas permis, faute de majoritÃĐ qualifiÃĐe, d’adopter le budget
2008/2009 et ont montrÃĐ que cette importante organisation fait face à un
sÃĐrieux problÃĻme de crÃĐdibilitÃĐ. Depuis des annÃĐes, l’OMPI fait l’objet de
critiques qui concernent en particulier sa direction. Divers manquements ont
ÃĐtÃĐ portÃĐs à la connaissance des États membres et sont documentÃĐs dans des
audits internes et externes. Dans ce contexte, la Suisse estime qu’il faut
dÃĐsormais prÃĐparer sans dÃĐlai le processus de renouvellement de la direction
de l’OMPI.

La Suisse, qui attend du Directeur gÃĐnÃĐral qu’il soit comptable de sa gestion devant
les États membres de l’Organisation, regrette que ce dernier n’ait pas jugÃĐ utile de
rÃĐpondre personnellement aux questions qui lui ont ÃĐtÃĐ posÃĐes à ce sujet. Elle
estime qu’il s’agit dÃĐsormais de prendre toutes les mesures appropriÃĐes en vue de
restaurer la crÃĐdibilitÃĐ de l’Organisation, faute de quoi celle-ci ne saurait s’acquitter
des tÃĒches qui lui incombent.

À cet effet, la Suisse juge prioritaire de prÃĐparer sans plus attendre, conformÃĐment
aux dispositions statutaires de l’Organisation, le processus de sÃĐlection visant à
dÃĐsigner au poste de Directeur gÃĐnÃĐral dune personnalitÃĐ Ã  mÊme de soutenir le
nÃĐcessaire processus de rÃĐnovation de l’OMPI.

La Suisse abrite de trÃĻs nombreuses organisations internationales et elle s’engage,
de maniÃĻre continuelle et avec dÃĐtermination, en faveur de la meilleure gouvernance.

Elle dÃĐfend des principes de gestion fondÃĐs sur l’intÃĐgritÃĐ, la transparence, la fiabilitÃĐ
et l’efficacitÃĐ. Il est dans l’intÃĐrÊt de la coopÃĐration multilatÃĐrale que les organisations
internationales ÃĐtablies à GenÃĻve ou ailleurs se conforment à ces standards.

2 Comments

  1. The Press release is not a surprise: the Swiss have their own declared candidate to replace the current DG. So their position may not be so “transparent” and in favor os good governance as they proclame.

Comments are closed.